Sigma DP2 Camera Review: Boing Boing Gadgets
Posted by brian | Posted in Camera Reviews | Posted on 11-26-2009
Tags: Boing, Camera, Gadgets, Review, Sigma, sigma dp2
25
Joel Johnson writes over at Boing Boing Gadgets: Should you buy the Sigma DP2? Only if you’re in love with the sensor. While it’s definitely a better choice than its predecessor and is not without its manual charms, its high price puts it in range of DSLRs and other cameras that come without as many limitations. Looking through a glass viewfinder is such a treat, though—too bad it doesn’t seem to actually line up very well with the actual pictures. Join the discussion on this video over at …
Rating: 3 | Views: 23399
i m sorry,.. but you are painful..
He did say he’s an amateur guys. Chill out. Its a lot of money for a sensor.
Wow! Dude has no idea what he’s talking about! Says it’s designed by “engineers” and not by “photographers” He means “designed by engineers for photographers, not for party-going consumers”
WOT
Terrible video/review
Well the photo of the sax looks good. (at least 2s shutter speed) But you’re right. There are no night pictures in their sample gallery, that’s fishy…
I was amazed about the great quality of their photos but the camera is also just to big. and without a zoom it’s rubbish.
So dp2 is not a gadget camera…
reviewed like a guy who knows nothing about cameras.
The problem with X3 image sensor is that it only works in daylight and with short exposure times. Look at night pictures or long time exposures. They suck! Just alot of noise.
yeh…. he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. The sensor in this camera is 6.7 times larger than the largest compact camera sensor and 11.4 larger than a typical compact camera sensor.. and almost exactly one-third the size of a full frame sensor.. not “about the same size”
I doubt that you have anything better to spend your time on… and you ARE wrong.
With this game we can forever go on and play, but I have better things to spend my time with than replying to e-mails of denial. It is not wrong and I am not wrong. Let’s leave it as that. Don’t let the real world acknowledge the truth.
You might think so, but its wrong. You are wrong.
you say that I am incorrect. I’ll explain to you why I am correct.
If you watch every person that stands infront of you carefully, you’ll see that every action is followed by a reactiong.
His face and gestures are based on disbeliefe. When a movement by the face or body does not fit the words which one is saying, it indicates a lie.
The body contradicts the mind.
Too bad that Canon, Sony, Nikon, Panasonic and Kodak don’t use the Foveon sensor in their user-friendly point-and-shoot cameras: They have too much financial and emotional investment in their current sensor technology. Unfortunately, their sensors require lots of internal processing to overcome the inherent limitations of non-coincident red, green and blue pixels, and even then can’t match the Foveon, even with twice the pixel count. Sigma should try harder and make theirs user-friendly.
weird
okay,
ur kinda hot.
No, you are incorrect sir.
pfff
yeah
qqq
i have better camera than that
Lame camera. Why bother.
Ye clearly it’s me who is lieing, I have all reason for lieing about the subject..
It’s a quite pathetic statement to say that I am lieing. The thing is that we humans express certian movements and emotions when we lie. You are leaking tons of them. But then, the question is simply not “if” someone is lieing, but why are they lieing.
It’s not that hard to see lies in the human face, you should study it.
It’s the art of observation, the truth about lieing.
ttt
lol awesome!! you can watch more full anime vids on animeboard . co . uk