What is the best DSLR Nikon camera for low light indoor sports photography for purchase today?
Posted by brian | Posted in Sports Photography Help | Posted on 11-11-2009
Tags: Best, best camera for indoor sports, best dslr for low light photography, best dslr for sports, best dslr indoor sports, best indoor dslr, best indoor sports camera, best low light dslr camera 2009, best nikon camera for low light, best nikon camera for sports, best nikon for indoor sports, best nikon low light, best nikon low light camera, best nikon slr for sports, best nikon sports camera, Camera, canon nikon indoor sport, craig lammes, Dslr, dslr indoor sport, dslr indoor sports, Indoor, Light, Nikon, nikon low light, Photography, Purchase, slr digital camera for indoor sport, Sports, Today
3
I like the features and resolution quality of Nikon cameras so I want to know of the current Nikon DSLR lineup which should I go for when it comes to low light sports photography?
Image taken on 2008-10-25 21:29:44 by gCarraig (craig lammes). Image Source. (Used with permission)
Related Posts
- Can anyone reccomend a Nikon lens for low light indoor sports photography?
- What’s the best kind of DSLR for sports photography?
- What do you consider as a good Lens for indoor sports photography? ?
- What would be a good lens to use in a low light situation for sports photography?
- I use a Nikon FM10 for my black and white photography. I need to purchase a flash for nighttime photography.?
I’m a Nikonian myself (D200), but I must confess that if low light sports is your thing, you should go with Canon. Nikon is great up to around ISO 800 but beyond that, Canon provides better image quality. I’d day Nikon is usable up to ISO 1200 vs. ISO 3200 for Canon.
Both companies have a 50mm f/1.4, fast f/2.8 zooms, and enough other goodies to destroy several credit reports.
For sports you’ll probably want the 30D for its 5fps (or the virtually identical 20D at a discount.)
As much as I love my Nikon (D200 too), low light is not its forte. Canon has a much better track record with low light performance.
I like my D200 also, but I have not tried it in low light sports applications. If you are going to get Nikon regardless of the above recommendations, then the D200 is pretty good, but you might consider stepping up to the D2X or D2Xs. It has a slightly higher pixel count and can actually shoot a cropped image at 8 fps. The D2X is rated at a longer shutter life than the D200 and if you use a lot of “motor drive,” typical of sports photography, this might make s difference. It also has the CMOS sensor that seems to help the Canon’s in those low light (high ISO) situations, so Panacea might even approve.
Whichever brand and whichever camera you choose, get an image stabilization lens! VR for Nikon or IS for Canon. Man, I imagine the Nikon 200-400 f:4.0 VR (constant) lens is a treat to use.